People experience curated recommendations, personalised feeds, and AI-powered anticipation in every corner of their lives. They are not going to accept a fixed programme with no choice at a conference.
The same person who receives a tailored streaming recommendation the moment they open an app, who gets a shopping experience built around their previous choices, and who interacts with AI that anticipates what they need before they ask, is the person sitting in your conference audience. Their expectations do not reset when they walk through the door of your event. They carry those standards with them. And according to new research from across Australia and New Zealand, the industry is not yet meeting them.
Personalisation ranks as the second most important factor the industry expects to matter by 2030, behind only measurable ROI. 66% of event professionals rate it as essential or very important. One in three attendees now explicitly expects a more personalised event experience. And the format the industry most wants to leave behind is the one-size-fits-all, cookie-cutter event, named more often than any other as the thing professionals are most eager to move away from.
The data on what will define events by 2030 tells the same story. Measurable ROI leads at 72%. Personalisation follows at 66%. Diversity and inclusion in Speaker lineups sit third at 56%. Sustainability at 40%. Two-thirds of the industry already sees personalisation as critical. That is not a future aspiration. It is an expectation already forming in the audience sitting in rooms right now.
There's no question that people are going to want more personalised, individualised event experiences. And I think AI can support you to do that. Holly Ransom, CEO, Emergent and Keynote Speaker
The most visible shift in event design is the move from fixed, linear programmes to formats built around choice. Multi-track conferences, unconference sessions where attendees shape the agenda, and festival-style layouts where people move freely between experiences are all responses to the same underlying expectation: people want agency over how they spend their time.
The Australian Open offers a useful parallel from outside the events industry. It transformed from a tennis tournament into a festival of tennis. Attendees can go and not watch a single game. They can explore multiple curated spaces, discover things they did not know were there, regulate their own energy, and move between experiences at their own pace. Even ground-pass holders have access to curated spaces beyond the tennis itself. The experience is designed for exploration and choice rather than passive, scheduled consumption.
The best business events are beginning to apply the same thinking: multiple spaces to explore, a mix of casual and formal environments, and the ability to choose depth on the topics that matter most while staying at the surface level on others. The key principle is giving people agency over their experience, not simply giving them more of everything.
AI tools are already being used to build personalised event experiences. Tools that pull from attendee profiles to recommend sessions, suggest connections, and populate custom agendas are emerging rapidly. Nearly four in ten event professionals already use AI tools for planning, content, and marketing. The technology exists and is improving quickly.
But trust has not kept pace with capability. Only one in twenty respondents said they would trust an AI recommendation for a Speaker without additional human verification. The rest want a discovery call, a content review, a video of a previous Keynote, or verification from a Bureau or trusted source before acting on what the technology suggests. The industry is enthusiastic about AI as a tool but unwilling to hand over judgement entirely. That caution is not irrational. In personalisation specifically, poorly calibrated recommendations can reinforce existing biases rather than expand what an attendee encounters.
The more significant AI opportunity in personalisation is not in replacing human decisions but in making better information available faster. AI that analyses every question submitted through a polling tool, identifies patterns across the audience, and helps a Speaker record a targeted follow-up video is already practical and useful. AI agents that handle delegate communications and post-event reporting, freeing planners to focus on experience design, are close behind. The technology does not need to be sophisticated. It needs to be pointed at the right problems.
By 2030, Gen Alpha, the first generation born entirely after the smartphone, will be entering workplaces and business event spaces. They will arrive having never known a world without personalised digital experiences. But they will also arrive with something the industry is not yet fully prepared for: a lack of conditioning for large-scale live events. A generation that grew up during and after the pandemic may find a thousand-person cocktail party overwhelming rather than exciting.
This creates a dual design challenge. Events need to offer the personalisation and choice that younger generations expect while also providing structure and scaffolding for those who are not yet accustomed to navigating large live environments. Pre-event preparation, smaller welcome formats, clear wayfinding, and multiple engagement pathways will all matter more as this generation enters the audience.
The practical implications extend beyond any single generation. 33% of young people no longer drink alcohol, which means event design built around evening drinks receptions and cocktail networking is already misaligned with a significant proportion of the next generation of attendees. The non-alcoholic shift, the preference for shorter formats, and the expectation of being able to shape your own schedule are not generational quirks. They are the direction the whole market is moving. Younger audiences are simply arriving there first.
We've got a generation that isn't conditioned to doing things live. You can't put them in a thousand-person cocktail party and expect that to feel anything other than overwhelming. Event professionals need to meet them where they are. Holly Ransom, CEO, Emergent and Keynote Speaker
Meaningful personalisation does not require expensive technology or a complete programme overhaul. The research is clear that even light-touch use of audience insight can significantly lift perceived value and relevance. The practical starting point is straightforward: before your next event, ask registrants a single focused question about what they most want to take away, and then act on the answers. Use those inputs to shape session groupings, inform Speaker briefs, or adjust the emphasis of the programme. The research shows that personalisation is widely expected but rarely delivered in meaningful ways. Even a small step in this direction is noticeable.
The broader design principle the research recommends is giving people agency without creating anxiety. The smartest personalisation is not unlimited choice. It is a curated choice with clear signals: here is your recommended starting point, and here are two or three things that might take you somewhere unexpected. A festival-style layout with no navigation is overwhelming. A multi-track programme with a recommended pathway for different audience profiles is genuinely useful.
The future is not a single event designed for everyone. It is an ecosystem of formats, scales, and channels designed to meet different people where they are, with the right level of choice and the right amount of guidance.
Also in this series: